[Music]
we'll go ahead and call tonight's uh
july 28
2020 to order
just for general
uh
work that the board does if anybody has
any uh
republic we should comment on the
operation where he's at now's your
chance
seeing no one in the audience wants to
discuss public comment we'll go ahead
and close public comment we'll move on
to approval of the minutes
from the june
um
23rd meeting
does anybody have any comments or
corrections or questions on this
[Music]
say no
um
next is the staff report
but we'll go on
that's just for the all the uh items
let's move on
there's no you know old business on the
agenda tonight we'll move to the new
business uh the first applicant is app
2221 which is 244 for 2844 elm
is is that looking in here for a 2844
island street
um we'll move that
uh we'll move that to later in the
meeting
this is
2401 fair avenue
is anyone here for
a fair avenue perfect if you can please
come up and be sworn in
all right
please state your let me start
would you prefer to wait until your
architect's here here it is
um
kathy is there any background on this
one of the items i've included in with
the staff report are the applicant's
comments regarding the variance
questions in the application so if you
care to
look at those you can do those in the
staff report but i'm really just going
to give a summary and
talk about the code in my staff network
so
uh architecture here
uh they're seeking a certificate of
appropriateness and
also a variance eight foot nine foot
variance from mexico section 125209r6
which requires a 25 foot
setback from the rear property line for
the principal structure
this
this was
previously submitted by another
contractor who didn't quite provide
adequate
details and
design for the order
which is
very clearly
shows that
we see how it
has an attached garage that does not
function well for the current
a new designer and
they're looking to do an addition to
expand existing garage however it does
occur to eight feet nine inches
but very very set back
but it's also does provide parking at
the rear of the property
and it's the corner lot and it's not
encroaching on the
side setback of the side street this is
a rather large spot for the zoning
district so um
the board um
voted on this recommendation and
positive to all of you um unanimously
unanimously as a consent agenda
you